Posts Tagged ‘Michigan’

Michigan may be 1st state to issue food stamps twice a month

Monday, March 10th, 2008

LANSING, Mich. (AP) — Michigan could become the first state in the nation to issue food stamps twice a month, making fresh produce and meat more available and giving grocery workers steadier hours.The state’s 1.2 million food stamp recipients — the highest number ever — now have their benefits added to a debit card within the first 10 days of the month. They then spend those dollars early in the month, typically in poorer, urban areas where residents may have limited transportation.

Each recipient gets an average $88 a month.

Retailers say the once-a-month assistance is spent early and usually all at once, causing them problems with staffing, cash flow and inventory. Advocates for the poor say food stamp recipients aren’t buying enough healthy, fresh food throughout the month.Legislation that would require the state to issue food stamp benefits two times a month may be approved by the state Senate this week. A similar measure sponsored by Democratic Rep. Andy Meisner of Ferndale is pending in the House. Recipients who get lower amounts of assistance would still get their payments just once a month.

“I’m trying to help people help themselves,” said bill sponsor Martha Scott, a Democratic senator from Highland Park. “I see people buying so much stuff the first of the month. You want to help people balance things out.”

Distributing food stamps twice monthly would give shoppers more flexibility and encourage them to buy fresher foods at least twice a month, she said.

While the legislation has backing from groceries and unionized workers, not everyone thinks more frequent payments is the solution. They wonder if the problem could be fixed instead by extending the period in which money is added to debit cards from 10 days to 20 days, which would spread out the days food stamp recipients shop.

The state Department of Human Services, which is neutral on the bills, is surveying food stamp recipients to find out their preference and how a switch would affect them. Results should be ready for lawmakers in April.

DHS spokeswoman Maureen Sorbet said the agency is prepared to go to twice-monthly payments or a longer period of payments depending on survey results, legislative developments and getting approval from the federal government, which pays for food stamps. A farm bill being negotiated in Congress could prove a stumbling block, since it includes a provision that would ban states from changing food stamp distribution from once a month.

Terri Stangl, executive director of the Saginaw-based Center for Civil Justice, credited the state for conducting the survey. Some recipients have limited transportation and prefer using their money to buy in bulk for better purchasing power, she said.

“I’m not convinced that with the amount of money they’re getting, they’re going to buy more fresh food,” Stangl said.

Scott, however, argued that issuing benefits once a month but extending the period in which they are handed out would help grocers and their employees, but not recipients.

Chris Michalakis, lobbyist for the 50,000 Michigan members of the United Food and Commercial Workers union, said grocery employees are pushed to work extra hard in the first 10 days of the month, then see their hours cut for the rest of the month.By distributing food stamps more equally over the month, he said, “workers will see a more even distribution of hours, as well as a greater availability of hours.”

The legislative debate comes at a time when 12 percent, or more than one in nine, Michigan residents get food stamps. Eighty percent of benefits go to households with children. The number of food stamp recipients in Michigan has doubled in six years, most likely because of the weak economy.

The real issue that needs to be addressed, Stangl said, is that food stamp households are able to buy less food because assistance has been eroding each year. The federal food stamp program assumes families have enough of their own money plus food stamps to spend $1.05 per person per meal — not enough for a health diet at today’s prices, she said.

Although the federal farm bill would boost money for food stamps, the price of fresh fruits, vegetables and leaner meats is rising faster than processed foods, making it harder for families to buy the healthier items, she said.

The food stamp bills are House Bill 4923 and Senate Bill 120. [source]

I may not be the smartest person in the world. I am wondering a few things. Do they have a limited time to spend the assistance? If the assistance is split up will each person’s allotment be the same or will they be getting a higher amount of allotment, or lower? Will this cost the taxpayers more in paperwork and salaries of DHS employees?

If they do not have a limited amount of time to spend their money then there should be no problem. The recipients are the ones who choose to spend it all at once. The government can’t help them there. If they are limited to an amount of time they can spend their assistance, then just extend the time to a full month, until they get their new allotment.

I understand the desire to buy in bulk. But what are they buying in bulk? At the grocery store in my town some of the meat is packaged in large packs called family packs. These are usually $0.20 cheaper per pound and those are the ones that have the best sales when they have meat sales. These are good things to buy in bulk. Buy the meat in bulk, freeze it ’til you need it.

About the $1.05 per person per meal, it can be done. Believe me, I have done it. But then again I use the money from my pay check I earn. I guess people are more careful with their own money than when they are using other people’s money. With the people who use the assistance to buy healthy food and then cash for beer, chips, pop, “doodli-doos” kid snacks and whatever else, they can use that cash to add to buying more healthy food. Don’t tell me that they don’t use cash to buy junk food, I have seen it.

As for Martha Scott wanting to “help people help themselves,” tell them to balance out their purchasing. Now, I do feel for the grocery workers. They are working their backsides off to earn living. I understand what it is like to have days where you are working overtime and tired out, then you end up having days where your hours are cut. But the government controlling people’s grocery habits ain’t the way to go. The assistance recipients need to control their own grocery habits.

Don’t Like the Results —— Vote Again?

Thursday, March 6th, 2008

I have been watching the news regarding what the Dems want to happen with the primary voting results in Michigan and Florida.

As you remember, the DNC (Democratic National Committee) … responded to the Michigan and Florida Democratic Parties announcement that they were moving their Primarys early. The DNC’s proposed penalty was that NO Delegates would be seated at the Denver Convention if MI and FL stayed the course and held their Primaries earlier than originally approved.

Not only where the Delegates & Super-Delegates stripped from each state but the DNC pushed the Dem Presidential Candidates to refrain from Campaigning in these two “Rouge” states. With those threats, Obama and Edwards took their name off of the Michigan Ballot. So Clinton easily won the Dem Primary here in Michigan. She also carried the Florida race.

So with those penalties clearly stated, both the Michigan and Florida Democratic Parties went ahead with their Primaries.

Reviewing the media sites we read how there are those who want Michigan and Flordia to schedule new elections.

Five options for Florida and Michigan

Dean agrees Fla. and Mich. mulligan needed

Michigan, Florida governors push to seat all delegates

Will Michigan Dems hold do-over?

Here is my Take:
An Election was held in both states and the election results were certified. How can anyone argue that another vote should be taken. Does this mean that any time we don’t like the results of a valid election … we just reschedule another election and go with the results we like better?

The Dems did not plan that it would be HARD to capture the NOMINATION by not counting the election results from Michigan and Florida. Let me tell you something- the results of moving the primary ahead were clearly understood. The Dems would not allow any Delegates to be seated in the Dem National Convention and the Republicans were penalized one half of our delegates at our Minneaplois Convention.

Michigan Republicans were ready to live with the results of losing half of our Delegates by moving our primary early. We did not want to be LOST in the Mass of Euphoria of the states competing for attention of the Presidential Candidates on Super Tuesday February 5, 2008. If you review the campaigning of the Republican Presidential Candidates after the New Hampshire Primary all the candidates were here in Michigan. You may also remember that the scope of the campaign also addressed the Depressed Economy here in Michigan.

The DNC should have thought about the ramifications of their proposed penalty to Michigan and Florida. Not just push for another election ….

This is just my two cents …

John Niemela

www.HoughtonGOP.com
www.firstgopblogs.com/Houghton

Glenn Beck/Second Hour

Tuesday, March 4th, 2008

Now his panel from the first is back on. They are talking about Florida and Michigan. I had computer probs. So I will try to catch up. Hillary is blaming the Michigan and Florida issue on Republicans. Can you believe the nerve? They are talking about how it still looks like there is going to be a long fight for Hill and Bar. They were talking about how Rush Limbaugh is urging Republicans to vote for Hill. Rush wants to see a big fight. Hey could blame him? Unfortunately, there isn’t as much fun on the Republican side. I have heard about Rush’s reasons. The longer Hill and Bar are in this, the more money they, their donors and the DNC spends. Plus, the longer it takes to get nom for the Dems, the less time they have to gather for a general election.